Stanley myeres No Genius
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Stanley myeres No Genius
Spread the word my friend.... Stanley myeres No Genius, He was a Scammer. Stanley myeres lost a law suit for scamming investors and didn't and couldn't show his invention worked. The courts made him show his invention and was founded that he scammed his investors and was charged to pay the two investors 25,000
Lawsuit
In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed. According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the Department of energy and the military.The Water Fuel Cell however, was examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.
Meyer claims the Times article wrongly implies that the U.S. Patent Office has not the ability to rule on the technical merits of issued U.S. Patents, as so granted to inventor, Stanley A. Meyer, under 35 USC 101 and that the article wrongly implies that the Plaintiff's three experts had the necessary scientific background to properly evaluate the various stages of the tech-development of the WFC technology.
Stanley Myers was a mechanical engineer. And he talks about others not having the necessary scientific background. He himself has no electronics background what so ever and talks about others not having it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer
Lawsuit
In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed. According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the Department of energy and the military.The Water Fuel Cell however, was examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.
Meyer claims the Times article wrongly implies that the U.S. Patent Office has not the ability to rule on the technical merits of issued U.S. Patents, as so granted to inventor, Stanley A. Meyer, under 35 USC 101 and that the article wrongly implies that the Plaintiff's three experts had the necessary scientific background to properly evaluate the various stages of the tech-development of the WFC technology.
Stanley Myers was a mechanical engineer. And he talks about others not having the necessary scientific background. He himself has no electronics background what so ever and talks about others not having it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer
Gentlemansteve- Posts : 81
Join date : 2008-08-03
Re: Stanley myeres No Genius
I will let this one past since I deleted your other post but from now on try not double posting.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|